Agglomeration in bulk bags:
Guide to multistage material conditioning
ガイドの内容
Agglomerated, bricked, or solidified materials in bulk bags present a common challenge in powder handling. Flexible Intermediate Bulk Containers (FIBCs) are used across industries, storing and transporting everything from food powders to chemicals and minerals. If agglomeration is left unaddressed, hardened lumps block process equipment, disrupt flow, and even pose safety hazards.
This comprehensive guide outlines a four-stage conditioning process to restore such materials to a free-flowing state. The guide covers bulk bag conditioning, decanting, lump breaking, and conveying. You’ll discover information about:
- The purpose of each stage
- Equipment recommendations
- Decision criteria
- Operational risks.
We provide expert insights and safety considerations to help plant managers, process engineers, and operations leaders handle solidified bulk bag contents efficiently and safely.
1. Bulk bag conditioning
Conditioning bulk bags is the first and most critical step when dealing with solidified or compacted materials inside an FIBC. The goal is to loosen and break up large agglomerates while the material is still in the bag, ensuring it can be discharged smoothly.
Over time or due to environmental factors such as moisture, pressure during storage, or temperature changes, powders and granules can consolidate into rock-hard masses that block discharge and disrupt operations. Conditioning returns materials to a manageable, free-flowing form.
A bulk bag conditioner, also known as a bulk bag crusher, restores flowability by breaking apart the hardened material inside the bag. By applying mechanical force externally to the bag, this process crushes agglomeration and prevents issues like blocked spouts or feeder downtime during unloading. This stage is especially important if the downstream process demands consistent particle size or uninterrupted flow like when feeding a reactor or dosing system.
Bulk bag conditioning equipment and methods
Choose equipment based on agglomeration severity:
- Bulk bag conditioning system: a dedicated station with either compression plates or hydraulic massage arms that squeeze and knead the bag to break up its contents. Standalone bulk bag conditioners can exert tons of force.
- Bag massagers: small pneumatic paddles or vibrators integrated into a bulk bag unloader frame can help with minor compaction, but they typically exert limited force. Built-in bag massagers use roughly three tons of force.
- Forklift-based manual conditioning: operators attempt to loosen material by shaking or dropping the bag with a forklift or pounding it with blunt force. Manual conditioning is not recommended, due to increased risk of bag rupture, uncontrolled falls, or injury.
Features of bulk bag conditioners include:
- Hydraulic pivoting arms or compression plates used to apply controlled pressure on the bag’s sides. Compression plate models press from two sides at a fixed height, suitable for moderately caked, uniformly solid material. Advanced units with pivoting massage arms move vertically and can reach the top and bottom sections of a bag that fixed plates might miss. This targeted approach is ideal for severely agglomerated or unevenly compacted materials because the arms travel along the full height to break all hardened zones.
- Rotating turntables spin the bag, allowing conditioning from all sides for thorough breaking of lumps.
- Integrated bag massagers: Many bulk bag unloader frames come with optional side paddles or vibratory pads that jiggle or press on the bag to promote flow. These are suitable for mildly compacted powders but are often ineffective for heavy caking or extensive hard agglomeration, known as bricking. For products like sugar, wax, or wet crystalline powders, an external conditioning unit is usually necessary upstream of the discharge station.
Decision criteria: When to condition bulk bags
Not every bulk bag requires full conditioning. Use the following criteria to assess material characteristics and process requirements:
- Degree of agglomeration: Light caking or a few soft lumps may be handled by simple bag massage or by breaking lumps as they discharge. Bricking warrants a conditioning cycle.
- Material sensitivity and value: High-value or sensitive materials benefit from gentle, controlled conditioning to avoid contamination. If the material forms hard lumps that are difficult to dissolve or blend, conditioning helps prevent blend inhomogeneity or long mixing times due to leftover agglomerates.
- Bag integrity: Sturdy, multi-trip FIBCs can usually withstand a bulk bag conditioning. If a bag is older, has weak seams, or if it’s a thin, disposable bag, there’s higher risk of bag rupture during aggressive conditioning. Using a lower-force method or splitting the bag in a controlled environment is a safer bet. Modern conditioners often feature adjustable pressure settings and sensors to avoid over-crushing a bag.
- Throughput and operational efficiency: If your process regularly handles bulk bags with agglomerated material, a dedicated conditioning station is a sensible investment. It can dramatically reduce unloading time and manual labour, especially compared to ad-hoc methods. If hardened bags are rare or only mildly agglomerated, operators might manage with manual tactics — although at some safety risk. Weigh the frequency and severity of bulk bag agglomeration in your operation against the cost and benefits of proper equipment.
Operational risks in bulk bag conditioning
While conditioning improves downstream flow, it introduces its own operational considerations.
- Bag rupture and spillage: Exerting high force on a compromised bag can cause the fabric to tear and spill contents. The risk is mitigated with well-designed conditioners that hold the bag securely in an enclosure or use plates to distribute pressure evenly. It’s important to monitor the bag’s integrity during conditioning. If any portion of the bag starts to overstretch or stitching begins to tear, stop and evaluate.
- Dust release and containment: Breaking up material inside the bag can release dust, especially if the bag isn’t perfectly sealed or has minor leaks. Fine powders might escape around the spout or seams when the bag is squeezed. It’s important that conditioning units have dust-tight enclosures, or the bag spout is tied off. Some systems keep the spout clamped or include a shroud during conditioning to catch any fines. If the material is hazardous or potentially explosive, consider conditioning in a sealed chamber with ventilation or under inert atmosphere.
- Over conditioning: Excessive or repeated squeezing can grind the material too finely or generate heat from friction. Most powders won’t heat significantly from a few compression cycles, but very long conditioning or extremely hard, abrasive lumps could cause slight warming or particle degradation. Limit force and cycles to what’s essential to restore flow. A typical automated cycle takes a few minutes.
- Equipment stress and maintenance: Ensure regular inspection of hydraulic systems, frame welds, and safety interlocks. A jam could damage the conditioner. Many systems incorporate pressure relief valves and robust guarding for safe operation. Always follow manufacturer maintenance guidelines to maintain reliability.
Safety considerations for bulk bag conditioning
Bulk bag conditioning requires strict safety protocols.
- Safety features: Operate conditioning equipment with all guards in place and doors/cages closed. These machines can easily crush wood or metal and would be fatal to a person. Modern units have light curtains or gates stopping operation when they are breached. Never bypass these safety features.
- Operator training: Ensure operators understand how to initiate the cycle safely and how to recognise problems. Never reach in or cut the bag while conditioning is in progress. Lockout-tagout procedures are crucial if an inspection or manual intervention is required.
- Securing the bulk bag: Verify the bag is properly secured on the conditioning platform and won’t slip out. The conditioner should accommodate the full bag size. If conditioning a partially discharged bag, make sure the spout is retied to avoid an uncontrolled release of material when the bag is squeezed.
- Noise protection: Be mindful of noise. Hydraulic systems can be loud so hearing protection might be needed.
- Ergonomics: Plan workflow so forklifts or hoists can load and remove bags from the conditioner efficiently, minimising any need for manual lifting by operators.
2. Decanting or bulk bag unloading
Decanting refers to the safe and controlled emptying of the conditioned bulk materials into the next stage of the process. After conditioning, the material should be free flowing but needs to be transferred out of the bag into a hopper or feeder, or directly into downstream equipment.
The goal of decanting is to transfer material from the FIBC into the process smoothly and safely. In ideal conditions, decanting is as simple as fixing the bag on an unloading frame, untying the discharge spout, and letting the powder or granules flow out at a controlled rate. When dealing with previously solidified materials or challenging products, special decanting approaches are often needed. This section ensures the material can be moved out without causing blockages, spills, or equipment strain.
Decanting equipment and methods
There are two primary approaches to bulk bag decanting — spout unloading and split bag unloading.
- Standard spout unloading: In reusable bags, the spout is untied or released via a safe access mechanism on the unloading station. The bag is supported by a frame above a receiving hopper. Features of a good unloading station include a spout clamping system and flow control devices like iris valves or pinch bars to modulate the flow. For free-flowing materials, a spout unload is preferred for its control — you can start and stop flow, and retie if needed. Modern bulk bag dischargers often integrate vibration pads on the hopper or bag massage paddles on the sides to encourage the last portions of material to flow out.
- Bag splitting: If a bag’s contents are so solidified they won’t flow out of the spout, or if the bag has no spout, splitting the bag open is an alternative. Split bag unloading involves cutting an opening in the FIBC to let material drop out freely. This is usually done in a specialised enclosure or with automated equipment.
- Manual cutting: The bag is slit with a knife or blade by the operator. This approach is simple but comes with risk, including operator injury and inconsistent opening that may cause uncontrolled flow. Manual splitting should only be last resort.
- Engineered splitter frames: Bag splitter frame systems have built-in blades inside a contained chute. The bag is seated in the frame and lowered onto the knives or the knives are raised into the bag, slicing it open and dumping materials into a hopper directly beneath the frame. Splitter frames are predictable, empty more thoroughly, require minimal direct handling, and can handle very tough bags that are difficult to cut manually. They are popular for single-use bags in high-throughput operations, where saving the bag isn’t needed and speed is important.
Decanting into intermediate containers: In some cases the bulk bag might be unloaded as a whole into a secondary container or vessel (e.g., dumping into a bin, drum, or screw conveyor hopper for metering). One specialised solution is the Disposable FIBC Unloader (DFU) design. A DFU station is built to discharge material directly into a conveying system for immediate transfer. The bag unloads into a hopper feeding a conveyor such as an aero-mechanical conveyor (AMC) or pneumatic conveyor. DFU setups are ideal for continuous processes where you want bulk bag unloading to seamlessly integrate without accumulating material in a hopper. There’s often a provision for loss-in-weight dosing or batching. A DFU can turn a bulk bag into a controlled gravimetric feeder by mounting the bag frame on load cells and using a feeder.
When choosing a decanting method, consider whether your process is batch or continuous. Batch processes might allow dumping the whole bag, then processing it. Continuous processes benefit from DFU or similar metered discharge to keep the flow constant.
Decision criteria: Choosing the right decanting method
The method of unloading depends on multiple considerations.
- Bag type: If using reusable bulk bags, the spout helps preserve the bag. If using single-trip disposable bags, you have more freedom to split them open. The choice also influences equipment. A reusable bag discharger will have spout access and clamping systems, but a disposable bag station might cut the bag and drop contents out.
- Material flowability after conditioning: If material remains in large clumps that could clog the spout, or if it’s a solid column that only fits the bag’s shape, spout discharge may be impractical. If the material forms an arch or bridge and doesn’t collapse, you may have to switch to a split method. Some processes take a hybrid approach — partially open the spout and if flow is very poor, cut the bag further.
- Process throughput and control: If your downstream process can handle material only at a certain rate, a controlled spout with a valve or a metering screw is needed. Dumping a whole bag at once, known as a “full column” dump, can overwhelm the next step. If you’re simply transferring the entire bag into a surge hopper or another container, a fast dump might be acceptable.
- Containment and dust control: If dust control is critical, a fully enclosed spout discharge with proper dust extraction is the best choice. Many splitter frames can be equipped with dust containment, but a sudden dump generally releases more dust than a controlled trickle. If the material is hazardous, cutting the bag open might release a cloud of dangerous dust. Use an enclosed chamber or stick with spout discharge through a sealed system to mitigate this situation.
- Segregating lumps: If large agglomerates remain intact, use a method that immediately directs those lumps to a lump breaker. For example, a splitter frame could be positioned over a coarse screen or directly feed a lump breaker to force materials through a breaker. If sizable chunks are expected, an open dump onto a conditioning grid or breaker is desirable.
Operational risks in decanting
Unloading bulk bags, especially with non-free-flowing material, involves several risks.
- Spout blockage and choking: Even after conditioning, it’s possible a large chunk of material can wedge in the spout outlet, preventing flow. If the spout clogs, operators might be tempted to poke up into the spout with rods or manually squeeze the bag, which can be hazardous. It’s better to anticipate this by using a spout with a larger diameter or by installing a flow aid such as a vibrator or a small lump breaker at the spout outlet. A blockage can also lead to ratholing where a narrow flow channel forms but a big arch remains above it, causing erratic flow.
- Uncontrolled release: Once a very cohesive material breaks free, the entire contents might rush out or surge in one go. This can overwhelm the hopper or conveyor below and create a large dust plume. Operators should stand clear when initiating flow, and ideally use equipment like iris valves or telescoping unloading tubes to modulate how quickly the material comes out. Never position yourself directly under a bag and try to catch or push the material out. Use the equipment to control it.
- Bag rupture during unloading: If a bag is damaged, it might rip open unexpectedly once weight shifts during unloading and drop a large mass of material all at once. Ensure each bag is inspected before lifting it into the frame. Some unloading stations have a safety cage or hopper to catch material if a bag bursts.
- Stuck bag remnants: In a splitter operation, sometimes pieces of the bag fabric can fall into the product stream. Care must be taken to capture or remove bag scraps, especially for food, beverage and pharmaceutical manufacturing, to avoid contamination. Additionally, a piece of fabric can jam a feeder or screw downstream. Good splitter designs hold onto the bag carcass after cutting or the operator can grab the empty bag remnants with tools.
- Ergonomics and workflow: Lifting and positioning bulk bags is typically done by hoist or forklift. Ensure lifting equipment is rated for the load and operators are clear of suspended loads. A common risk period is when aligning the bag spout to the hopper. Any sudden movement of the forklift or a snag can cause the bag to swing. Use tag lines or a spotter to safely guide the bag into place. If manually untying a spout, be cautious of any leaking material when you loosen the tie.
3. Lump breaking
Even after bag conditioning and successful decanting, you may still face oversized lumps or chunks of material coming out of the bag. Lump breaking is the stage where these remaining agglomerates are milled or crushed to a consistent particle size before further processing. This step is crucial if the downstream equipment requires a certain maximum particle size or if unbroken lumps could cause problems later, such as uneven mixing, clogging, or quality issues. By the end of the lump breaking stage, material should be returned to its original intended particle size distribution or to a homogenous, free-flowing state.
Lump breaking ensures all material is uniform and free flowing by eliminating any residual clumps that escaped the bag. This is especially important for processes demanding consistency, for example, feeding a fine grinder, dosing into a reaction, or pneumatic conveying. Effective lump breaking yields several benefits including materials dissolve or mix properly, flow smoothly through feeders, and meet quality specs without surprise chunks. This stage of material conditioning often serves as a final insurance before the material enters the main process stream.
Lump breaking equipment and methods
Lump breaking can be accomplished with various devices, chosen on material hardness, required throughput, and desired output size.
- Rotary lump breakers are common solutions for agglomeration consisting of rotating blades or paddles inside a fixed grid or comb. As material is fed through, blades shear and crush lumps against a stationary grate, allowing only smaller particles to pass through. Floveyor’s systems, for example, use inline rotary lump breakers paired with sieves to resolve agglomerations and ensure a uniform particle size before the material enters their conveyors.
Rotary lump breakers can handle fairly hard lumps of several centimetres in size and reduce them to under 1–2 cm. The rotary lump breakers are usually installed at the discharge of the bulk bag hopper or as part of a transfer chute so all material must pass through them. Key features to look for include modular design for easy cleaning, robust construction, and variable speed to handle different materials.
- Screens and grids: A simpler method is to have a scalping screen or breaker grid at the hopper where the bulk bag discharges, for passive lump breaking. Large lumps are physically too big to pass through, so they sit on the grid. Operators or mechanical agitators can then push them through or break them up so they fall through the openings. This is a low-cost method and has no moving parts, but it can be labour intensive and is not suitable if continuous automated processing is needed. Use only if lumps are infrequent or relatively soft, or as a backup safety screen to catch foreign objects.
Decision criteria: When and how to break lumps
Consider the following when implementing lump breaking.
- Size and hardness of lumps: Gauge the worst-case lump size coming out of the bag after conditioning. If it’s only golf-ball sized soft clumps, a simple screen might be enough. If it’s larger than a cricket ball, or extremely hard, a powered lump breaker is needed. Many processes set a maximum lump size tolerance and use that to specify the grid size or crusher gap.
- Material friability: Fragile, brittle solids usually break easily and a mild lump breaker or even the conveyor is sufficient. Tough, ductile materials such as waxes, polymers and damp fibres might smear or not break cleanly. These materials are likely to require specific breaker designs such as a slower rotor, cutter blades, or pre-chilling to make them brittle. Choose lump breaker designs to match how your material breaks. An open rotor design with antistick coatings might be needed for fatty or moist agglomerates that could gum up screens.
- Throughput and process continuity: Ensure the lump breaker can handle the flow rate of material coming from the bag. For high throughputs, twin-shaft lump breakers or multiple units in parallel might be considered. Also decide if the lump breaker will run continuously as the bag discharges or if you’ll collect material then feed it through in batches. Continuous processes typically incorporate the lump breaker inline so material flows through steadily. Batch processes might allow dumping everything into a hopper, then starting a lump breaker to clear the hopper before sending material onward.
- Integration with conveying: It often makes sense to place the lump breaker right at the point of discharge, like under the bag unloader’s hopper, allowing gravity and the weight of material to assist in feeding lumps into the breaker. If an AMC or screw conveyor is used next, the lump breaker can feed directly into it. Some integrated designs mount a lump breaker at the hopper outlet flange to meter the material to the conveyor while crushing lumps. Check that the downstream equipment inlet can accommodate the lump breaker output. If not, you might need a small surge hopper between the breaker and the conveyor.
- Contaminant control: Breaking lumps can introduce foreign materials. To address this, many systems include a magnetic separator or metal detector after the lump breaker. Floveyor’s conditioning set-ups feature inline magnets to capture any metallic foreign bodies. If your material is food or fine chemical, incorporate magnets and screens to catch any stray pieces of broken bulk bags or equipment.
Lump breaking operational risks
While a relatively straightforward unit operation, lump breaking has pitfalls that need to be monitored.
- Jams and overloads: A lump breaker can jam if an unexpectedly large or unbreakable object enters it. To mitigate this, use a safety grill upstream, or select a breaker with a shear pin or torque limiter that halts the motor on overload. A jam can stall production and potentially damage the drive if the drive is not protected. Monitoring motor current can give early warning of a jam or an excessively hard lump.
- Excessive fines generation: If lumps are broken too aggressively, they can generate fine particles or dust. While the aim is to break lumps, the original particle size of the product should be preserved. Over-milling could create dust, leading to segregation or requiring re-blending. Choose a breaker that crumbles lumps at relatively low speed rather than pulverising them at high speed. Some rotary lump breakers are explicitly designed to minimise fines.
- Wear and tear: Hard lumps can be abrasive, causing wear on breaker blades, screens, and housings. Regular inspection of the breaker is necessary. Keep spare parts such as blades, screens and conveyor belts handy if your process runs continuously. Abrasion can also enlarge the clearance in the breaker over time, meaning you might start seeing larger pieces slip through if wear and tear are not monitored.
- Noise and vibration: Many lump breakers generate noise when breaking hard chunks. Ensure the unit is properly mounted with vibration isolation if needed to avoid shaking structures or causing fatigue cracks in mounts. Provide noise enclosures or PPE for operators if noise levels are high.
- Cleaning and cross-contamination: If you run multiple materials, be aware the lump breaker can hold residual material in the teeth or corners of the housing. Quick-release designs and easy access for cleaning are beneficial. A lump breaker is one more item to clean between batches, which should be accounted for in operational planning.
4. Conveying to downstream process
Once the material is conditioned and any remaining lumps are eliminated, the final step is conveying the material to its next destination. It might include a process reactor, mixer, silo, packaging machine, or other bulk material handling equipment. The material should be in a mostly free-flowing form. The choice of conveying method and equipment must accommodate the characteristics of the material while ensuring any residual tendency to clump doesn’t cause trouble. This section discusses how large agglomerates (if any remain) can impact downstream equipment and how to ensure a smooth transfer.
Conveying moves the conditioned material efficiently while preserving its quality and flow. Ideally, after conditioning the material behaves like a normal bulk solid, and a standard conveyor can transport it. However, agglomeration may pose lingering concerns. If not all fines were fully re-integrated, the material might be slightly more cohesive or have varying particle sizes. Selecting optimal conveyors or feeders that can handle these properties is key to avoiding blockages. In many cases, conveying is not about just moving material, but also metering it at the right rate to the next step. This is especially true when feeding into a reactor or blending operation.
Conveying equipment options
Aero-mechanical conveyors (AMCs)
Floveyor invented aero-mechanical conveyors, which use a high-speed rope and disc assembly to drag material in an air stream. AMCs are very efficient for powders and granules, moving material rapidly in any direction. Cohesive or agglomerating materials can present challenges for AMCs, potentially causing blockages or inefficiencies. It’s crucial to remove lumps above a certain size because an AMC has a relatively small tube diameter and the rope and disc can be damaged by large chunks. With properly conditioned material, AMCs convey smoothly and help keep particles dispersed. If minor clumps remain, the AMC’s turbulent action often breaks soft agglomerates apart.
Screw conveyors and feeders
A screw conveyor can steadily move cohesive materials that might stick or have slight lumping because the screw’s mechanical action forces material along. They are good for moderate distances and can also serve to meter the feed, especially if a variable-speed drive is used. For materials coming out of a lump breaker, a screw conveyor is often a logical choice to take material from the hopper to the next vessel. Ensure the screw diameter and pitch can accommodate any remaining small lumps. If lumps the size of the screw diameter get in, they can cause a jam or stall. Be alert for wear if the material is abrasive or if hard lumps were not completely eliminated, as a stubborn chunk can gouge the trough or flights. Screw conveyors are relatively enclosed, which is good for dust, and can be purged or made vapor-tight if feeding into a reactor.
Pneumatic conveying systems
Moving material in an air or gas stream through pipes, pneumatic conveying systems are either vacuum or pressure systems. Pneumatic systems can handle fine powders well, but large agglomerates are a big problem. A lump too large can plug a pipe elbow or simply not pick up into the line. It’s best to only use pneumatic transfer if you’re confident lumps larger than a certain size are gone. Pneumatic lines also tend to re-agglomerate if the material is sticky, because particles can collide and stick together or stick to walls. On the plus side, pneumatic systems can transport long distances and are fully enclosed. Consider using vacuum transfer if pulling material from a bag dump station or small hopper. For bigger continuous flows, pressure systems might be employed after the lump breaker.
Tubular drag or chain conveyors
These slow-moving mechanical conveyors drag material in an enclosed tube using disks attached to a chain or cable. They handle a range of materials, including somewhat sticky or friable ones, and can navigate complex routes. If minor clumps remain, tubular drag conveyors (TDCs) usually pull them along, but a very large lump could sit in the tube and cause a blockage. Cohesive, agglomerating materials can cause blockages or inefficient movement in drag conveyors, making conditioning and lump breaking upstream critical. The advantage of a chain conveyor is gentleness and full containment — it won’t fluidise or segregate the material.
Belts and vibratory conveyors
A belt conveyor can carry large lumps easily, limited only by the belt width and the feed chute size. If conditioned material is still somewhat lumpy but it’s acceptable at the next stage, belts are forgiving because they won’t jam. The drawback is belts are open, so dust and spillage can be an issue. Vibratory conveyors, on the other hand, excel at handling fragile or non-cohesive materials. They might not be ideal for very fine powders or slightly sticky materials. If your material is prone to agglomeration, it likely has some cohesiveness that might make a vibrating conveyor less effective, causing material to stick instead of sliding. For dried granules that just had lumps broken, a vibratory tray could work for short distances.
Impact of agglomeration on downstream conveyors
If large agglomerates slip past the previous stages, they can manifest as problems in conveying and beyond.
- Hopper bridging and ratholing: Conveyors are often fed by hoppers. A hopper above a feeder or screw can experience bridging if material still has cohesive clumps. Bridging is when material forms an arch or crust over the outlet. It is often triggered by a few stubborn lumps creating a stable arch that finer material can’t break. This stops flow until the bridge collapses which can require intervention. Similarly, even if bridging doesn’t fully occur, the flow may channel or rathole through the hopper and not draw down evenly. To mitigate this, ensure a mass-flow hopper design or use devices like vibrators, air fluidisers, or mechanical agitators in the hopper. Thorough deagglomeration with no big pieces to form a bridge is the best prevention.
- Screw conveyor jamming and wear: A screw feeder might encounter a chunk it can’t push. The chunk may rotate with the screw instead of moving forward, eventually causing the motor to overload. A lump might also get wedged between the screw flight and the trough wall, locking the screw. Many screws have torque limiters or sensors. If the safety feature is tripped, clear the blockage following lockout procedures. Lumps can also increase wear. A hard inclusion acts like a grinding stone against the screw or liner. If a process handles abrasive lumps, using hardened or wear-lined screws is advisable.
- Pump and valve clogging: If the downstream process involves transferring the solid into a liquid or a slurry, lumps can clog valves or pump intakes. A lump might lodge in a rotary valve of a pneumatic conveyor or block the eductor of a jet pump. In reactors, a big lump might sit undissolved at the bottom, effectively taking up agitator capacity or later clogging a discharge valve. Overly large agglomerates can even create a false reading on level sensors by floating on top and making the vessel appear fuller. When conveying into these systems, often a last-chance strainer or grid is installed at the point of entry to catch anything too big.
- Extended mixing or dissolving times: If the material is being conveyed into a mixing vessel, any remaining lumps will extend the process time. They may eventually break apart under shear, but if blending conditions aren’t capable of quickly removing agglomerates, it leads to excessively long mixing times or blend inhomogeneity. In a liquid, lumps take longer to dissolve due to their lower surface area-to-volume ratio. This could slow down batch cycle times or, worse, some lumps might never fully dissolve by the time the batch is used. For a reactor or formulation, that could mean potency or concentration differences. Prevent these downstream inefficiencies by ensuring all material is in fine form before conveying.
- Product quality and consistency: Downstream equipment like sieves, packagers, or extruders can be directly impacted. If conveying into a packaging machine, a surprise lump might block the funnel or cause the weight to be off. In an extrusion or process, a lump could cause a defect or equipment damage. Quality assurance often includes a final check for oversize particles. Some systems incorporate a vibrating sieve or screener after conveying as a QA step, which then recirculates or ejects the oversized pieces.
Ensuring smooth conveying
When handling materials with a history of agglomeration, consider these best practices in the conveying stage:
- Break agglomerates before conveying: If your material tends to form lumps, include a means to break them down before or at the conveyor inlet. This could be a lump breaker or even a simple agitator in the feeder. The conveying equipment should ideally receive material as uniform as if it were virgin, non-caked powder. It’s far easier to break lumps in a controlled fashion at a hopper than to fight a clog in a long conveyor run.
- Conveyor design margin: Slightly oversize the conveyor for the expected material flow and size. If you expect occasional chunks up to 20 mm, choose a conveyor that can pass 30 mm chunks just in case. Running a conveyor below its maximum throughput also helps, as it’s less likely to build up and pack solids. For example, a pneumatic line sized with extra air velocity can blow minor agglomerates through, where a marginally sized line might choke.
- Instrumentation and monitoring: Use level sensors in hoppers to detect if material is not flowing. A constantly full hopper might indicate a downstream blockage; a suddenly empty one could mean upstream bridging. Motor current monitors on mechanical conveyors can detect a jam early. For vacuum conveyors, monitor vacuum level — a sudden spike means a blockage is likely. Smart automation can interlock the stages. For example, if the conveyor stops, it should halt the upstream feeder or bag unloading to avoid overfilling and compounding the issue.
- Downstream flexibility: If conveying into a sensitive vessel or process, give some buffer. Convey conditioned material into a small surge hopper above a mixer rather than directly into the mixer continuously, so if flow is inconsistent the mixer isn’t starved or flooded. In a continuous reactor feed, having two parallel conveyors — one on duty and one on standby — might be worth it if the material is critical. This prevents downtime so one can take over if the other clogs.
- Environmental controls: Ensure during conveying the material doesn’t pick up moisture or heat that could re-agglomerate. A long humid conveying line can cause the powder to cake. Use dehumidified conveying air for pneumatics if needed, or keep equipment cool if material is heat sensitive.
Conclusion and best practices
Dealing with agglomeration or solidified materials in bulk bags requires a thorough, staged approach. By breaking the challenge into conditioning, decanting, lump breaking, and conveying, plant managers and engineers can systematically eliminate flow impediments and safety risks associated with hardened bulk materials. Skipping any stage can compromise the next. As highlighted, each stage has specialised equipment and techniques to handle the task — from heavy-duty bag conditioners exerting extreme forces to restore material flowability, to refined lump breakers ensuring uniform particle size for optimal processing, and finally to conveyors that reliably transfer the product onwards.
Consider the decision criteria at each stage of implementation. Know your material’s behaviour. Use that knowledge to choose the right tool for each job. Always keep in mind the operational risks and design the safeguards accordingly, be it guarding on machines, dust containment, or backup procedures for stubborn materials.
Industries as varied as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, agriculture, and mining all grapple with the issue of solidified bulk bags. The solutions outlined here are broadly applicable. In practice, a combination of methods often yields the best result. By following this multistage guide, operations leaders can significantly reduce unplanned downtime, improve worker safety, and maintain consistent product quality even when raw materials arrive in less-than-ideal condition. The payback comes in smoother production runs and confidence that upstream material issues won’t cascade into major production bottlenecks.
Finally, always continuously improve. Monitor how often bags need conditioning, how the lump breaker is performing, and whether conveying is ever interrupted. This data can inform future procurement decisions. With the right preparation and equipment, even the most stubborn bulk bag can be tamed into a free-flowing resource for your process rather than a dreaded nuisance.
Floveyorと連絡を取る
Gain efficiency with Floveyor bulk bag unloading solutions. Optimise your bulk material handling, improve operator safety and reduce downtime. Contact us for more information, or get a quote.
